A new legislative proposal in Russia has sparked debate over digital privacy and telecom regulation. As part of russia news today, lawmakers are advancing penalties that could reshape everyday life in russia. The bill introduces fines for individuals and organizations that transfer mobile phone numbers to third parties without following legal procedures.
Duma committee backs amendments on mobile number sharing
The State Duma’s Committee on State Building has approved amendments to administrative law that introduce financial penalties for unauthorized number transfers. The proposed changes are part of a broader bill originally aimed at regulating the transportation and logistics industry. Lawmakers added the telecom provisions before the bill’s second reading. The initiative has now been officially published in the Duma’s legal database.
Amendments target violations of telecom contracts
The new measure would insert Article 13.29.1 into Russia’s Code of Administrative Offenses. The article creates legal liability for transferring a mobile subscriber number or granting access to telecom services in violation of the law. The rules apply to individuals and legal entities who fail to comply with existing service agreements. The proposal reflects ongoing government efforts to tighten control over mobile phone registration and limit anonymous communications.
Fines vary depending on legal status
Under the new proposal, private citizens who unlawfully transfer a phone number could face fines between 30,000 and 50,000 rubles. This is roughly equivalent to $340 to $560. Individual entrepreneurs would face fines from 50,000 to 100,000 rubles. Corporations could be fined up to 200,000 rubles. Lawmakers clarified that giving someone temporary access to a number for personal reasons would not count as a violation.
Life in russia under increasing telecom oversight
Digital transparency and state control continue to expand as part of life in russia. Officials argue the legislation will prevent fraud and protect consumers. However, critics warn that it could lead to further surveillance and restrict lawful information sharing. The enforcement mechanisms and appeal process remain unclear.
